- G*n Confiscation - My response to INL's video yesterday

 

- G*n Confiscation - My response to INL's video yesterday

Here's the link to the actual interview comment: https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1413595082238873607?s=20

Israeli News Live didn't use THIS clip but used an: 08-second clip from the OAN broadcast for his video. https://twitter.com/AnitaLea1/status/1413967799895138306?s=20

https://youtu.be/N0XTB5pmbh4 - "Biden's Plan to Confiscate Bibles and Guns"

This is irresponsible at best, and should indeed be classified as fear-mongering.

Here's the actual full quote:

Rep. Madison Cawthorn said President Joe Biden's call to offer COVID-19 vaccines door-to-door

->could lead to the government taking people's guns and bibles.<-

Cawthorn, a Republican from North Carolina, was speaking Friday during an interview at the Conservative Political Action Conference event in Dallas, Texas, taking place this weekend. He was speaking with Right Side Broadcasting Network, a conservative media outlet.

"And now they're sort of talking about going door-to-door to be able to take vaccines to the people. The thing about the mechanisms they would have to build to be able to actually execute that massive of a thing," Cawthorn said, in reference to Biden's latest community-based vaccine push.

"Think about what those mechanisms ->could<- be used for. They ->could<- then go door-to-door to take your guns. They ->could<- go door-to-door to take your bibles," Cawthorn said.

https://www.businessinsider.com/madison-cawthorn-vaccines-effort-could-lead-to-taking-guns-bibles-2021-7

Video clip included in the link.

Here's my consensus:

This is Right-Wing fear propaganda to get gun owners riled up and increase the tension.

Then, when an incident does happen where a gun owner fights back BOOM then... it's a self-fulfilling prophecy if that makes sense.

How many times did you see/hear the word "could" in his quote? 

I counted four times, these are speculative comments from Rep Madison Cawthorn. 

As of right now, there is no truth or proof of these comments at all.

What INL should have done was focus on the could instead of implying with their comments that it WAS happening.

They should have given the warning of COULD, but also stated that they were going to further look into the validity of the comments made by the Representative.

The question that I have is why didn't they?

Saying something is actually happening when it isn't, is bearing false witness. 

According to Scripture, every truth is to be established by at least two-three witnesses.

This COULD spark the civil war that is needed for the chaos, so that way they can march in their "peacekeepers." 

I think we should all just take a deep breath and calm down. *sigh* 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/could 

Definition of could

past tense of CAN

—used in auxiliary function in the pastWe found we could go., in the past conditionalWe said we would go if we could., and as an alternative to can suggesting less force or certainty or as a polite form in the presentIf you could come, we would be pleased.